The future of brands: 7 takes from Jim Stengel

Recently, Jim Stengel, the former global marketing officer at P&G, opened up on his blog on what he perceives as the future of marketing. I very much liked what he had to say. My takes and comments.

1. Brands are becoming more important not just as identifiers in crowded markets but also as valuation mechanisms. As Stengel points out, 30 years ago, “almost none of the market capitalization of the S&P 500 could be attributed to brand equity; today it is above 30%.” Stengel sees that as a sign that marketing has become more important. I agree – certainly in the sense that brand can now be visibly seen to add value on the bottom line. I wonder though whether marketing itself has gotten more important or whether it has become increasingly important for marketers (with their heritage involvement in communications) to evolve their understanding of the value, performance and application of brands.

2. Marketing will be more and more about the behavior of the people behind the brand, not what the brand says. Absolutely. Last week’s post about “human marketing” centred entirely on this point. Increasingly brands are judged not just by what they deliver, but how they deliver it – and people are the key component in delivery. If your human marketing doesn’t cut it, nothing else will compensate.

3. Marketing will integrate and synthesize with other disciplines. And vice versa in my view. The globalisation of markets is being clearly mirrored by the globalization, convergence and integration of functions. Delivering “on brand” now involves not just everyone – human marketing again – but almost every aspect of the organisation’s intellectual and operational arsenal.

4. Competitiveness will increasingly be right-brained in its orientation. Stengel’s own words: “Empathy and artistry will get more important. Empathy is at the heart of marketing because it is the ability to see and feel through someone else’s perspective. Artistry is the intuition and creativity to invent something that offers something new and important for a customer” Yes. Yes. A thousand times yes.

5. We’ll all know more, so we better make sure that, as brands, we understand more. Hadn’t really seen the full implications of this one I have to say, but Mr Stengel’s absolutely right. “Big data and advanced analytics will profoundly impact how well we understand our business.” We tend to hear so much about the privacy concerns of big data, but this marketer’s point that it will also yield big insights is very true. The key seems to lie in what brands do with all the information that will flood their way. Those who percept and act will swim and win. Those who try to filter and wait will drown or be swept away.

6. Great brands will continue to “[upend] the business model”, questioning and reframing the frameworks, zones and channels within which they do their business. And they will do so, not for innovation’s sake, but because the changes they make to the ways they are organised will bring them closer to consumers. Great point, well made.

7. Finally, marketers will need to become more nimble and adaptive in how they present their brands and associated messages to communities of consumers who are no longer at their desktop. Instead those people will, in time, be moving rapidly, impatiently and individually, through areas of a city or town that they are highly familiar with. Getting their attention, remaining part of their conversation and attracting them to engage will require new approaches and new ways of thinking about media. Stengel quotes Eric Schmidt in saying that the future for brands will be “social, local and mobile”.

Plenty for all of us to think about here as we power into 2012.

More reading

envelope

Enjoyed This Post?

Great. Sign up for my blog updates and have posts sent straight to your inbox.

I absolutely respect your privacy. Your details are safe.

0 Comments

  1. Nice summary Mark. With regard to points #2,3, & 5 we touch on those in a post I wrote “How social enables brand resilence” – our model leaning heavily towards the brand experience but adds what we think is a new angle called “brand breadth”.

    http://igo2group.com.au/blog/how-social-media-enables-brand-resilience/

    So the brand promise is delivered through brand experience and that comprises depth and breadth. Typically we talked about depth. Breadth relates to the social presence and social touchpoints of a brand and company. These are an asset which needs to be strategically developed, in a more holistic way than in the past. We think that will be a trend becoming apparent in 2012. We focus on the role of that in creating brand resilience, especialliy how to optimise resiience in times of brand crisis.

    Walter @adamson

    • Walter – your breadth idea is very interesting. You’re right, so often we think about the depth of a brand in terms of its ability to do what it promises to do. Breadth dimensionalises the thinking in a refreshing and very different way, and your detailed and generous post provides some exciting and inspiring thinking. Thanks for sharing.

      One question for you: is breadth purely social are you thinking? Or could it potentially express itself through other channels? My own sense is that it probably is if for no other reason than the economies of scale and the intensity of relationship that can be generated – but since this is your company’s idea I’m interested to hear your perspective on this.

  2. Pingback: Highs and lows: the new value equation in the social economy? « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  3. Pingback: The new take on redundancy « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  4. Pingback: Why women are driving the rethinking of the sales model (amongst other things) « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  5. Pingback: New article: 5 things to do when social media reacts to you « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  6. Pingback: “What are we going to do?” « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  7. Pingback: Gazing into the tea leaves « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  8. Pingback: The business of cloning « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  9. Pingback: The efficiency debacle « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  10. Pingback: Strategy, or resource budget? « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  11. Pingback: Rethinking the response « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  12. Pingback: Is the digital economy actually an economy (yet)? « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *