The business of cloning

There has been a carbon copy approach to business for some time, and business schools are  at least partly to blame. Management is now a taught vocation. OK – we all have to learn, but the problem is that everyone’s taught the same things and taught to work in the same ways. Same ideas. Same principles. Same rules.

As Dr Dan Herman observes, “All  those managers who are supposed to compete with one another … are using the same data; they conduct the same focus groups and the same surveys, analyse the data with the same tools, and use the same concepts and approaches in order to create distinctive products and brands. The result? … [they] achieve the same results, simply because they think the same way. In other words, they are MBA clones.”

Today, we teach process rather than the ability to process information. We form models rather than opinions. We rely on frameworks rather than asking people to extrapolate by drawing on experience. In this context, differentiation is a risk.

Too many managers, it seems to me, think they can rely on precedent, risk minimisation and sheer volume and speed of actions to achieve steeper and steeper results. That approach is a black swan bird-strike waiting to happen. Imitation may be the most sincere form of flattery, but looking to produce more of the same than everyone else isn’t the most effective way to compete. It just makes you more and more replaceable.

And in precisely the same way as people in commerce are encouraged to think alike, they are also taught to measure success and relative competitiveness in the same way.

Let me go out on a limb here. I see benchmarking as possibly the most dangerous tool businesses have. Not because comparison is wrong in itself, but because of the way companies use it to yardstick all the wrong things. Instead of referencing what other companies are doing by the numbers, my view is that they should be examining how effectively top performers are thinking. And instead of focusing on just players in their own industry, they should be comparing themselves with other industries – adopting what has been proven elsewhere, and using those learnings to change how they can succeed.

The irony of replication is that once you think alike, look alike, process alike, distibute alike and message alike – there’s nothing left to like. Every ounce of charm has been carefully and methodically ironed out.

More reading

envelope

Enjoyed This Post?

Great. Sign up for my blog updates and have posts sent straight to your inbox.

I absolutely respect your privacy. Your details are safe.

0 Comments

  1. Pingback: Highs and lows: the new value equation in the social economy? « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  2. Pingback: The new take on redundancy « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  3. Pingback: The efficiency debacle « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  4. Pingback: Strategy, or resource budget? « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  5. Pingback: “What are we going to do?” « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  6. Pingback: Credentials as comfort food « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  7. Pingback: For your information: why so many brands are not listened to « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  8. Pingback: Know thy enemy « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  9. Pingback: The power of being purposeful « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  10. Pingback: Market leadership: you can’t lead as a brand if you follow another brand. « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  11. Pingback: Rethinking the response « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  12. Pingback: Reading the minds of millions « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  13. Pingback: Twinkle, twinkle, twinkle … « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  14. Pingback: Posting a profit « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  15. Pingback: Excitement vs risk: The very different emotions driving purchase of B2B and B2C brands « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  16. Pingback: Strategy: why the 2% is so critical « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  17. Pingback: Customer service is worthless « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  18. Pingback: Out of the blue moments « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  19. Pingback: Brands shouldn’t try to make sense « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  20. Pingback: Brand dynamics: the shapeshifting of brand likeability « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  21. Pingback: The portfolio approach to strategy « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  22. Pingback: Affirmation: how to make a brand experience really count « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  23. Pingback: You have to out- in order to -est. Simple. « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  24. Pingback: Does my brand look big in this? « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  25. Pingback: Strategy: 11 ways to purposefully achieve growth « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  26. Pingback: Market adjacency – have you asked the two key questions? « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  27. Pingback: Maintaining brand loyalty: 4 ways brands get it wrong « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  28. Pingback: The contradictions of eyelashes and data « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  29. Pingback: The death of demographics? Does it matter? « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  30. Pingback: Crunching on cacti « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

  31. Pingback: The strategy of radical beauty « Upheavals: Mark Di Somma's blog

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *